rishi

 

marthamarcy rev 1 thumb 630xauto 41056 Review : Martha Marcy May Marlene

The opening scene of Sean Durkin’s debut feature Martha Marcy May Marlene suggests we’re in for a big rusty bread pan’s worth of rural miserablism, and even though we’re not, the yeasty grayness of those early moments is clearly intentional: A group of women in drab dresses and droopy T-shirts go about preparing dinner in a house whose unfinished interior looks either new and hastily erected or ancient and about to fall apart — it’s hard to tell which. A young boy stomps about in a dusty, scrubby yard; a woman sits on the porch working on a crocheted afghan. When dinner’s ready, a bunch of men sit down to eat; then they leave the table — the man who appears to be the leader murmurs something appreciative about the meal — and the women take their places. Then there’s one lone shot of a ton of dirty dishes jumbled into and around the kitchen sink — there’s no question who’s going to be scouring them clean. It’s as if Amishtown had been taken over by a nicer version of the Manson family.

Or maybe they’re not so nice. But what makes Martha Marcy May Marlene so beguiling — aside from the performance given by its lead actress, Elizabeth Olsen — is that the pall of creepy groupthink that hovers over that first scene works as a perverse kind of seduction: You want to know more about this place, and about these people, even though you suspect that knowing more may not be a good idea. Even if you think your brain is soap-proof, Durkin succeeds in washing it just a little bit.

The heart, soul and eyes of Martha Marcy May Marlene belong to Olsen’s Martha, a young woman who leaves this strange, crazy-cozy household very early in the movie: We see her heading into the woods with just a small pack on her shoulder, though we also hear the squeak of a screen door and a man’s voice calling after her. Wherever it is she’s running from, she ends up at the Connecticut summer home of her sister, Lucy (Sarah Paulson). The two are clearly estranged, and not just because Martha’s been in a cult for a couple of years; from their exchanges, both the early and the late ones, we can see that the two sisters have never been close. Lucy is now married — a development Martha knew nothing about — to a vaguely uptight architect or developer (all we really know, or need to know, is that he’s some kind of property guy) played by Hugh Dancy. The two welcome her into their luxurious split-level house on the lake, obviously wishing they could unwelcome her.

From that point, Martha’s present, in oh-so-safe Connecticut, is intercut with scenes of her past, in that commune somewhere in the Catskills. The place she’s left is presided over by a bookish self-proclaimed prophet named Patrick (John Hawkes, looking like Charles Manson as shot by Walker Evans), who has built a pastoral Utopia where the inhabitants live off the land and allegedly love one another unselfishly. The setup works out fabulously for him — he gets to ritualistically sleep with all the women. But Martha, he claims, is his favorite, and if she stupidly believes it, somehow we do too: She has a solemn, knowing face, with eyes that can melt one minute and pierce the next. She takes to the welcoming pseudowarmth of this new family, even as we can see she’s holding herself apart from it just a little bit. When she’s first introduced to Patrick, by the savvy-dippy young cult member (played by Louisa Krause) who’s taken her under her wing, she compliments him on what he’s done with the land, planting vegetable crops and whatnot. “It’s as much yours as it is mine,” he says with a twinkle of phony generosity in his eyes; she smiles at him a little too demurely, as if to say that she’s listening but not buying, at least not yet.

Olsen’s performance is restrained but not tentative; you could say the same for the movie around it.

Olsen’s performance is restrained but not tentative; you could say the same for the movie around it. Durkin, who also wrote the script, doesn’t indulge in lots of shaky camera business to convey, you know, the character’s inner turmoil. (The DP here is Jody Lee Lipes.) Even though there’s at least some handheld camera work, you have to really look for it: Some camera dude out there is working really hard at keeping the frame steady, and it’s almost a subliminal effect — if Martha is looking for something to hang onto, maybe we are too, though we barely know it.

Durkin is perhaps too obvious in the way he heightens the contrast between Martha’s lumpy-oatmeal commune existence and the overpolished gloss of her sister’s lifestyle. At one point Martha jumps up from sunbathing with her sister on a classy lakeside dock and leaps into the water completely nude, as she would have done back at the old communal swimmin’ hole. Lucy, aghast, hauls her out. “You can’t do that here!” she hisses, and I kept wishing the next line would be, “It’s Connecticut!” But of course it wasn’t — Durkin isn’t going for laughs here, though it’s all too easy to fill in the blanks for ourselves.

Still, Paulson and Olsen capture the uneasy electricity of siblings who just can’t get along but who nonetheless remain connected. Paulson plays Lucy as uptight but not unwatchably severe: Sometimes she looks at Martha as if she’d just landed from another planet — or, equally weird, just stepped off a lilypad — and given the unnerving nature of Olsen’s performance, you can see why. One minute she’s bracingly direct; the next she seems to be blinking her way through amniotic fluid, like a newborn lamb fighting for life. You don’t watch her and think, What a dope she is, having fallen for all that hippie-dippie cult stuff. Instead, you see how the perceived security of that makeshift family would make sense to her, up to a point.

In other words, Durkin doesn’t condescend to the character he’s written, and in return, Olsen rises to the challenge of that character. At one point, Patrick tries to punish Martha with twisted praise, asserting that she’s a lot like him. Minus the cruelty and the craziness, maybe she is: As Martha, Olsen throws off a muted self-assurance that reads as a kind of charisma. We fear for her every minute, and yet for better or worse, we’d follow her anywhere.

 

paranormal3 rev 1 thumb 630xauto 41179 REVIEW: Paranormal Activity 3 Good

My complicated muddle of feelings toward the Paranormal Activity franchise are directly related to my acute personal susceptibility to jump scares. They work on me embarrassingly well. A film that’s as reliant on them on Paranormal Activity 3, the series’ latest episode, can have me as twitchy as an meth addict out of agonized anticipation of the inevitable “boo.”

After all, the majority of the shocks in these films are low-fi affairs — that’s one of their signatures — that, taken alone, are no great shakes: A door slamming itself shut, the sound of footsteps in an unoccupied part of the house. The franchise stakes itself on the time spent waiting for these things to happen, as we take in characters in the mundane, vulnerable pursuits of sleeping or puttering around the house. These images come to us via the fiction of an unmanned camera; there’s no one there to step in to warn us when the spooky stuff pops up.

Like its predecessors, Paranormal Activity 3 is packed with moments primed to make you jerk back in your seat and fling your precious $8 popcorn in the air, some supernatural in origin and others goofy fake-outs. In between, it teases out the tension via the nighttime surveillance setups we’ve come to expect, as something demonic makes itself known in a suburban California tract home. I spent the majority of the film (as I did with its predecessors) stretched taut as a wire and filled with grumbly resentment. Is it effective? On a surface level, sure, though any feature so shaped around jolts is bound to be excruciating to me in about the same way one built around the graphic dismembering of puppies would be upsetting. But this easy button-pushing masks an experience that’s awfully insubstantial. Good for a few old-school jumps and giggles, Paranormal Activity 3evaporates once it’s over like morning mist.

Directed by Catfish duo Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman and written by Christopher B. Landon,Paranormal Activity 3 continues the prequelly backwards-tracking of the last installment, flashing back to 1988 and events documented on VHS. After an intro that finds grown Katie (Katie Featherston) storing a box of tapes in the basement of her pregnant sister Kristi (Sprague Grayden), the film plunges into the footage that was stored on them, of a time when the girls — now played by Chloe Csengery and a smashingly creepy Jessica Tyler Brown — were living with their mom, Julie (Lauren Bittner), and her boyfriend Dennis (Christopher Nicholas Smith), a wedding videographer who gets drawn into taping the strange happenings around their house at night.

Other than a few set details and a hideous period sweater or two, Paranormal Activity 3 doesn’t go out of its way to recall the ’80s.

Other than a few set details (Teddy Ruxpin proves capable of being menacing without any demonic assistance) and a hideous period sweater or two,Paranormal Activity 3 doesn’t go out of its way to recall the ’80s. It’s a choice that thankfully extends to its footage, which other than the brief use of a corner timestamp doesn’t attempt to mimic the look or quality of VHS. When trying to persuade Julie to fool around with him on camera, Dennis captures the hint of a supernatural presence in the room, and sets up cameras by their bed, in the girls’ loft, and downstairs to document the goings-on at night, when the majority of the oddness appears to take place. The activity is centered on Kristi’s imaginary best friend, Toby, who she hints — telling Dennis, for instance, that if she provides more details about Toby “I won’t be safe” — is a far more substantive and far less benign presence than her mother’s “kids will be kids” dismissals indicate.

The last of the three placements involves the film’s best idea, a camcorder that’s mounted on an oscillating fan base in order to cover both the living room and kitchen. A few clever, suspenseful scenes unfold between the two locations as we’re locked into the slow pan of the lens. Something ominous seems to be unfolding in one end of the floor, but we can’t stay with it, having to continue along with the impassive scan of the camera. By the time we get back, it’s gone, or grown, or relocated. It’s a canny twist on the limited perspective that feeds so many of the scares in the trilogy in general, as things happen off screen that we can only hear or are forced to guess at. This idea also comes up with the camera in the girls’ room, which focuses on them but excludes the closet in the corner, a low-ceiling space in which Kristi claims Toby lives.

Where Paranormal Activity 3’s weak points show are in the unbelievable silliness of its characters, who in typical haunted-house fashion deny and stay put longer than any sane human being would in the face of such disturbances, in the found footage problem of having to justify why someone would keep filming in life-threatening situations, and in its mythology. The franchise has been forced to come up with additional backgrounding as it reaches into the past and introduces new characters, and what’s provided here is a halfhearted mix of familiar elements from films like PoltergeistThe Blair Witch ProjectThe Exorcist and Rosemary’s Baby that come together for a finale that pulls out all the stops but ends up feeling a touch anticlimactic. The ending also raises some questions about how this film can possibly fit in with the other two — “they were young and they forgot” won’t really cut it. Then again, no one asks for Paranormal Activity’s answer to The Silmarillion — the film provides a few imaginatively eerie sequences and enough jolts to entertain a midnight crowd (and make this critic curl up into a ball of cowardice), which is all it needs to deliver.

 

Avengers 2 Characters News : Kevin Feige Talks New Characters in ‘Avengers 2′

During the Avengers panel at New York Comic-Con this past weekend, Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige had to field several questions about a topic that fans are already buzzing about: Where does the Marvel Movie Universe go next, once The Avengers is finished its run in theaters?

In addition to what Feige said during the panel about possible Marvel Cosmic projects likeGuardians of the Galaxy, he also dropped word that Avengers 2 will likely feature a different team roster than the first film.

 

IGN was able to get the scoop when they asked Feige direct if we would be seeing some different Avengers in the next film – to which Feige responded:

“Absolutely. That’s the fun of it — introducing new characters,” said Feige when asked point blank whether fans should expect a change-up to the roster. “Seeing: ‘How will things change after Iron Man goes through his next adventure? After Thor goes through his next adventure? If we do another Cap adventure, how will things change? The dynamic between them? Their own worlds? So that the dynamic in Avengers 2 is actually quite different than it is in the first one.”

Now, on the surface, this is a no-brainer: Marvel has signed a lot of the actors in The Avengers to multi-film contracts, yes. On the other hand, there are actors in the cast  (like Robert Downey Jr.) who will have been working on Marvel projects for over half a decade by the time Avengers 2 even begins pre-production; Downey could (and will likely) want to move on to other things.

Equally real is the fact that A) the general movie going public could be ready for some new blood in Avengers 2 (Black Panther, Hank Pym, Wasp), and B) Marvel is probably going to be expanding their universe anyway, trying to introduce characters like Dr. Strange and/orAnt-Man.

 

Captain AMerica Black Panther News : Kevin Feige Talks New Characters in ‘Avengers 2′Will Cap be back? Will Panther Assemble for duty?

 

Then there’s C) the fact that the introduction of new characters and new stories for established characters (in sequels like Iron Man 3Thor 2 and Captain America 2), will change the entire circumstances of Marvel’s movie world. In that sense, the Avengers sequel could, say, have Tony Stark as an administrator for S.H.I.E.L.D., or some metahuman liaison to the government, rather than playing an active role in the team  (cue brief RDJ cameo and War Machine replacement).

The only question is: which Avengers would assemble for the sequel, and which ones would be missing from active duty?

Which knew Avengers would YOU like to see in the sequel?

The Avengers will be in theaters on May 4, 2012.

 

Now that the L.A. portion of shooting forChristopher Nolan’s third Batman movie The Dark Knight Rises is finishing up, the production is packing up and getting ready to head out to New York City. And according to 24 Frames, someone working on the the film who has access to the actors’ schedules says that those in the movie have been briefed that while in New York they may be filming scenes that take place at the Occupy Wall Street protests.

What sort of craziness is this? Well apparently there are scenes of civil unrest in TDKR and instead of going through the trouble of making his own, fake protests, Nolan would like to see if he could add some authenticity to his film by using a real street movement as a backdrop. Everything that TDKR is actually doing is, of course, super secret. The movie doesn’t even film under its own name, it films under the code name “Magnus Rex,” so whether any of this talk about protest shooting is real or not is hard to confirm. This news is coming from one source that has contacted the L.A. Times, so to believe is to have faith in them.

If shooting that takes place at the protests actually does become a reality, it’s interesting to imagine how the social movement would respond to having a big Hollywood production in their midst. Would they see the movie industry as a tool of corporate greed and try to disrupt the shootings? Would they see the film as a big opportunity to get their message of global financial reform out to more people? Or would everyone just be super excited because it’s Batman? Personally, I’d just be super excited because it’s Batman, even if Bruce Wayne is the 1%. But also, I’m the type of person who figures that a big movie setting up shots in the middle of a protest scene is less likely something that’s really going to happen, and more likely just an idea that was being tossed around.

 

Franklin Leonard’s “Black List” has become pretty infamous over the years. It’s his yearly compilation of all of the best scripts that are floating around Hollywood and not being produced. Often times, appearing on this list can be the difference between a script that keeps getting passed from hand to hand without really being read and a script that gets an actual look from a studio and starts to get some money behind it. Some of the movies that appeared on the 2010 list that are now in various states of development include Margin CallArgo, Gangster Squad, and The Hunger Games, among others. Now there’s one more script to be added to the pile of Black List greenlights; Jenni Ross’sHot Mess.

Leonard’s description of Hot Mess is as follows, “Four girlfriends make, and then break, a list of rules devised to get the guys of their dreams and discover their inner hot messes in the process.” Endgame Entertainment is the company that has put the movie into production and they’ve hiredThe Hitcher director Dave Meyers to helm. But the big news, and the bit of the story that makes it seem like this movie is actually going to happen, is that they’ve attached Selena Gomez to star as one of the four girls. Usually the big piece of the puzzle that starts procuring a potential film funding is a big star attaching themselves to the project, and in Gomez Endgame has found themselves not only a girl who came out of the Disney machine of mega-celebrities, but also the girl who is currently burning up the tabloids by dating The Bieber. Just saying his name is enough to send throngs of tween girls running, screaming in your direction. Bieber.

Look out for this one, as it’s inclusion on the Black List means that it’s possibly a film of some substance, and the attachment of Selena Gomez, at the height of her extra-curricular infamy, means that the production will probably be high profile. Now to figure out if this girl can actually act. Did anyone see Monte Carlo?

 

 

brass monkey slice News : Renowned Commercials Director Nicolai Fuglsig Helms Big Screen Debut BRASS MONKEY for Paramount

If you’ve watched a Super Bowl (or TV in general) over the last few years, you’ve probably seen Nicolai Fuglsig’s work. He directed the Sony Bravia spot that featured thousands of bouncy balls breaking free down San Francisco’s streets. For Guinness, he presided over a lengthy domino/Rube Goldberg machine that ended in a bigger-than-life representation of a nice pint. Now Fuglsig can make the leap to the big screen with Brass Monkey, a real-time thriller that takes place during a Los Angeles killing spree. Hit the jump to check out a poster and read more onBrass Monkey.

 

News of Fuglsig’s move to direct a feature film comes courtesy of Deadline. Brass Monkey is an original creation dreamed up by Fuglsig himself. The first draft of the script was written by Paolo Marinou-Blanco (Goodnight Irene), although Brian Horiuchi (Circle of Eight) has been hired for a rewrite. Fuglsig also designed the graphic image for Brass Monkey as part of his pitch to Paramount. Fuglsig is still attached to helm Warner Bros.’ as of yet untitled futuristic Robin Hoodpicture as well.

 

 

the iceman james franco slice News : James Franco Leaves THE ICEMAN Citing Contractual Disagreements

It looks as if the biopic based on professional hit man Richard “The Iceman” Kuklinski will be short one murderous mentor. James Franco, who was slated to play Robert “Mr. Softee” Pronge, the assassination advisor to Kuklinski (Michael Shannon), has opted out of the project.

The Iceman is based on the book “The Iceman: The True Story of a Cold-Blooded Killer” by Anthony Bruno. Kuklinski claimed to have murdered over 250 men, committing his first at a very early age. Perhaps with Franco’s upcoming role in Oz: The Great and Powerful, the Oscar-nominated actor wanted to distance himself from the subject matter. Hit the jump for more on The Iceman

the iceman movie poster 01 461x600 News : James Franco Leaves THE ICEMAN Citing Contractual Disagreements

Sources at Just Jared claim that financial details were not the reason behind Franco’s departure:

“[Franco] pulled out because he couldn’t come to an agreement on key contractual issues that didn’t involve financial terms. Now it looks like this project might fall apart.”

While Franco’s role as a hit man’s mentor is surely key, The Iceman still sports Shannon in the lead role. You can check out Steve’s exclusive interview with him here. Although Maggie Gyllenhaal is just a rumor for Kuklinski’s wife Deborah, The Icemanboasts Benicio del Toro as mob boss Roy Demeo. The film, directed by Ariel Vroman (Danika), is slated to start filming this December. Check out the product description of the source material below.

At home Richard Kuklinski was a dedicated suburban family man. On the street he was the Iceman, a professional hit man and lethal scam artist, a man so heartless he kept one of his victims frozen for over two years to disguise the time of death. His personal body count was over 100, but the police didn’t have a clue. The Iceman exposes Kuklinski’s murderous double life.

 

Universal kicked off its “Social Cinema” platform on Facebook back in August with The Big Lebowskioffering the title at a cost of 30 Facebook Credits ($3) for a 48-hour window. Well, the 2003 Rowan Atkinson starrer Johnny English is no Lebowski, but it is timed to promote Friday’s U.S. release of the studio’s sequel,Johnny English Reborn. Here’s the release:

JohnnyEnglishReborn111018235950 275x154 News : Universal Adds First ‘Johnny English’ To Facebook Offerings

LOS ANGELES, CA, October 18, 2011—Universal Pictures announced today that it is extending its Facebook “Social Cinema” experience internationally by offering the first Johnny English film for rent in the United Kingdom and Australia, as well as the United States.

This marks the first time Universal has offered its Facebook Social Cinema application to international consumers. The debut of Johnny English on Facebook complements the theatrical release of the film’s sequel, Johnny English Reborn, which was released in the United Kingdom on October 7, 2011 and in Australia on September 15. The comedy/spy thriller will be released in the United States on October 21.

Fans and first-time viewers in these regions may be a part of the Johnny English experience by renting the film through Universal’s Social Cinema application, which will allow fans of the franchise to rent, view and interact with the first movie through the official Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/johnnyenglishmovie). Johnny English will be available for 30 Facebook Credits for a 48-hour rental window.

The Social Cinema application integrates social features into all aspects of the movie rental experience, leveraging Facebook’s powerful community features to spread the word, offer a coupon and enhance the viewing experience.

While watching the film online, consumers will have the ability to comment on and share memorable quotes and scenes, as well as see comments that friends and other Johnny English Facebook fans have made while watching the movie. In addition, users who rent the film will be able to pass along a 10 Facebook Credit discount on the rental for up to five friends through Facebook’s “Buy With Friends” platform.

NBCUniversal worked with Milyoni, a leading developer in F-commerce, who created the Social Cinema technology that offers movie lovers a unique, engaging, social viewing experience on the Facebook platform. To date, Universal has released The Big Lebowski and Scarface on Facebook through its Social Cinema application. These titles are currently available to consumers in the United States.

 

ABC has put in developmentAnti-Mafia Squad, a drama based on the 2009 Italian seriesSquadra Antimafia – Palermo Oggi. David Hollander (The Cleaner) will write the script and executive produce with the original series’ distributor Mediaset, Little Engine’s Gina Matthews and Grant Scharbo and Fluent Media’s Raul Mateu. ABC Studios is producing. The original series, which wrapped its third season in June, is set in today’s Palermo, caught in a war between mafia families for the leadership of Cosa Nostra after the arrest of the last godfather. It centers on two women: deputy chief of police Claudia Mares, who joins a special anti-mafia squad, and young Rosy Abate, a member of one of the oldest criminal clans, who returns to Palermo after a long stay in the U.S. ABC, ABC Studios, Matthews, Scharbo, Mateu and Mediaset originally tried to adapt the ICM-repped format last season, but the project had no writer and was rolled over to this season when CAA-repped Hollander was tapped for the job. I’m not familiar with Squadra Antimafia, but if there is something the Italians know how to do well it is mafia drama series/miniseries. If you haven’t seen the 1980s series La Piovra (The Octopus), I’d highly recommend it. Here is a trailer (in Italian) I found for the second season of Squarda Antimafia:

 

HBO is going for some serious acting firepower on the Noah Baumbach/Scott Rudin drama The Corrections. The pay cable network has Oscar winner Chris Cooper in negotiations and two-time Oscar winner Dianne Wiest set for the two leads in the project based on Jonathan Franzen’s book, which is yet to be formally greenlighted to pilot. The award-wining 2001 novel revolves around the troubles of an elderly Midwestern couple, to be played by Cooper and Wiest, and their three adult children — roles that are now being cast — as they trace their lives from the mid-20th century to “one last Christmas” together near the turn of the millennium. Baumbach and Franzen co-wrote the adaptation, with Baumbach set to direct the pilot. Rudin, who had been developing the project for a decade, originally as a feature, is executive producing with Baumbach and Franzen. ICM-repped Wiest, whose previous HBO series role on In Treatment earned her an Emmy, will next be seen in The Odd Life Of Timothy Green and Lawrence Kasdan’s Darling Companion. Cooper, repped by Paradigm and Untitled, will next be seen in The Muppets. His most recent TV gig was a co-starring role in the 2003 HBO movie My House In Umbria, which landed him an Emmy nomination.

© 2012 3D Movies Theatre Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha